Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorValera-Calero, Juan Antonio
dc.contributor.authorFernández-de-las-Peñas, César
dc.contributor.authorVarol, Umut
dc.contributor.authorOrtega-Santiago, Ricardo
dc.contributor.authorGallego-Sendarrubias, Gracia María
dc.contributor.authorArias-Buría, José Luis
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-16T07:06:31Z
dc.date.available2021-07-16T07:06:31Z
dc.date.issued2021-07-15
dc.identifier.citationalera-Calero, J.A.; Fernández-de-las-Peñas, C.; Varol, U.; Ortega-Santiago, R.; Gallego-Sendarrubias, G.M.; Arias-Buría, J.L. Ultrasound Imaging as a Visual Biofeedback Tool in Rehabilitation: An Updated Systematic Review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 7554. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18147554es
dc.identifier.issn1660-4601
dc.identifier.otherhttps://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18147554es
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12020/941
dc.description.abstractRehabilitative ultrasound imaging (RUSI) is used by physical therapists as a feedback tool for measuring changes in muscle morphology during therapeutic interventions such as motor control exercises (MCE). However, a structured overview of its efficacy is lacking. We aimed to systematically review the efficacy of RUSI for improving MCE programs compared with no feedback and other feedback methods. MEDLINE, PubMed, SCOPUS and Web of Science databases were searched for studies evaluating efficacy data of RUSI to improve muscular morphology, quality, and/or function of skeletal muscles and MCE success. Eleven studies analyzing RUSI feedback dur- ing MCE were included. Most studies showed acceptable methodological quality. Seven studies assessed abdominal wall muscles, one assessed pelvic floor muscles, one serratus anterior muscle, and two lumbar multifidi. Eight studies involved healthy subjects and three studies clinical populations. Eight studies assessed muscle thickness and pressure differences during MCE, two assessed the number of trials needed to successfully perform MCE, three assessed the retain success, seven assessed the muscle activity with electromyography and one assessed clinical severity outcomes. Visual RUSI feedback seems to be more effective than tactile and/or verbal biofeedback for improving MCE performance and retention success, but no differences with pressure unit biofeedback were found.es
dc.language.isoenes
dc.publisherMDPIes
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.titleUltrasound Imaging as a Visual Biofeedback Tool in Rehabilitation: An Updated Systematic Reviewes
dc.typearticlees
dc.issue.number14es
dc.journal.titleInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Healthes
dc.page.initial1es
dc.page.final18es
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccesses
dc.subject.areaFisioterapiaes
dc.subject.keywordUltrasound Imaginges
dc.subject.keywordRehabilitationes
dc.subject.keywordFeedbackes
dc.subject.keywordMotor controles
dc.subject.keywordSystematic Reviewes
dc.subject.unesco32 Ciencias Médicases
dc.volume.number18es


Ficheros en el ítem

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional