Transition to Adulthood Autonomy Scale for Young People: Design and Validation
Identificadores
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12020/1212ISSN: 1664-1078
DOI: doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00457
Fecha
2020-03-20Tipo de documento
articleÁrea/s de conocimiento
Ciencias de la EducaciónResumen
Given that autonomy is a fundamental process in the transition to adulthood, there
are several scales that measure the concept as a main construct or a constituent
feature of broader constructs. However, most of these scales are based on a notion
of autonomy focused on the individual, while the proposed scale aims to incorporate
the idea of the individual mediated by others and society. This article aims to show the
results of the design and validation process of the Transition to Adulthood Autonomy
Scale (EDATVA), which was developed using this approach. A group of 61 items with a
Likert-type response scale of four options was used on a sample of 1,148 Spanish and
Colombian individuals, aged between 16 and 21. A systematic process was performed
using an exploratory factorial analysis. Additional indexes were calculated from the
Rasch Model. The matrices obtained from the factorial analysis gave rise to a 4-factor
structure comprising a total of 19 items with weights >0.3. In the case of Spain,
the KMO test returned a value of 0.80 and in the case of Colombia, 0.83. In the
Rasch model, the Item Separation Reliability (0.99) indicates that the items constitute a
well-defined variable that meets the local independence assumption. Cronbach’s alpha
for the Spanish sample was 0.86 and for the Colombian sample 0.85. In conclusion,
this new scale consists of four dimensions: self-organization, understanding context,
critical thinking, and socio-political engagement. The scale is easy to use and interpret,
especially considering the age range of the target population and its possible uses
within the contexts of assessing and intervening in young people’s behavior. Due to its
characteristics, it can be used in family, educational, and social contexts. This scale is
valuable for research because its optimal psychometric properties provide an alternative
way of understanding autonomy.