Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorCabrera, Oscar
dc.contributor.authorGarcinuño, Sara
dc.contributor.authorPleguezuelo, Daniel
dc.contributor.authorGil-Etayo, Francisco Javier
dc.contributor.authorTenica, Iulian
dc.contributor.authorRodríguez de Frías, Edgard
dc.contributor.authorZafra, Denis
dc.contributor.authorCastro, Nerea
dc.contributor.authorPaz-Artal, Estela
dc.contributor.authorSerrano, Antonio
dc.contributor.authorSerrano, Manuel
dc.date.accessioned2026-02-26T15:34:34Z
dc.date.available2026-02-26T15:34:34Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citationCabrera-Marante, O., Garcinuño, S., Pleguezuelo, D. E., Gil-Etayo, F. J., Tenica, I., Rodríguez de Frías, E., ... & Serrano, M. (2023). Quantification of antiphospholipid antibodies: the importance of using an appropriate methodology for each clinical profile. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 24(24), 17373. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms242417373es
dc.identifier.otherhttps://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/24/24/17373es
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12020/1966
dc.description.abstractThe presence of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs) is associated with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), characterized by thrombosis and obstetric morbidity. aPLs included in APS classification criteria are lupus anticoagulant, anti-cardiolipin and anti-beta-2-glycoprotein-I of IgG or IgM isotypes. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay is the most used diagnostic technique to determine aPLs. Recently, new automated technologies mainly based in antigen-coated beads have been developed. The aim is to compare a fluorescence enzyme immunoassay (M1) and an antigen-coated bead assay (M2) in obstetric and thrombotic APS patients. All samples from the first 1020 patients received in the Immune Service Laboratory (Hospital 12 de Octubre) during the recruitment period, without exclusions, were analysed for aPLs. The weighted kappa for both methods in all the patients was 0.39 (0.30–0.47). Agreement increased to 0.56 (0.38–0.73) in patients with autoimmune disease. Sensitivity and specificity obtained for M1 were 17.1% and 89.3%, respectively, and 12.7% and 91.4% for M2. The sensibility and specificity of IgG isotypes were higher than the IgM ones. Regarding obstetric patients, M1 obtained significant diagnostic performance and had more sensitivity 23.75 (14.95–34.58) compared to M2 12.50 (6.16–21.79). In conclusion, clinical suspicion-based method selection for aPLs should be considered. To identify obstetric APS patients, solid phase methods remain more preferable.es
dc.description.sponsorshipThermofisheres
dc.language.isoenes
dc.publisherMDPIes
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.titleQuantification of Antiphospholipid Antibodies: The Importance of Using an Appropriate Methodology for Each Clinical Profilees
dc.typearticlees
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3390/ijms242417373
dc.identifier.essn1422-0067
dc.issue.number24es
dc.journal.titleInternational Journal of Molecular Scienceses
dc.page.initial17373es
dc.page.final17373es
dc.relation.projectIDCABAI1906es
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccesses
dc.subject.areaCiencias Biomédicases
dc.subject.keywordAntiphospholipid syndromees
dc.subject.keywordAntiphospholipid antibodieses
dc.subject.keywordLaboratory automationes
dc.subject.keywordAutoimmune diseaseses
dc.subject.unesco32 Ciencias Médicases
dc.volume.number24es


Ficheros en el ítem

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional