Anxiety and autistic traits in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Identificadores
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12020/1888ISSN: 1664-1078
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1680267
Fecha
2025Tipo de documento
articleÁrea/s de conocimiento
PsicologíaMateria/s Unesco
61 PsicologíaResumen
Background: Autistic traits are distributed along a continuum, and some
individuals exhibit subclinical characteristics without meeting diagnostic criteria
for autism spectrum disorder (ASD). This population, referred to as the broader
autism phenotype (BAP), has been associated with increased prevalence of
anxiety symptoms. Given that these individuals often do not access clinical
services or receive interventions, understanding how anxiety manifests within
this group is essential for improving psychological well-being and quality of
life. Although research on autism and psychopathology has expanded in recent
years, few studies have explored this relationship in adults with BAP from a
dimensional and transdiagnostic perspective.
Objective: This study aimed to systematically review and synthesize recent
empirical evidence on the relationship between autistic traits and anxiety
symptoms in adults, and to assess whether this association is statistically
significant.
Methods: A systematic search was conducted across four databases (PubMed,
Web of Science, Scopus, Dialnet) for peer-reviewed articles published between
2013 and 2023. Studies were included if they used validated instruments to
assess autistic traits (e.g., AQ, ADOS-2) and anxiety (e.g., HADS, STAI, GAD-7,
BAI). A total of 18 independent samples from 13 studies were included. Effect
sizes (Hedges’ g) were calculated and synthesized using a random-effects
model. Heterogeneity and publication bias were also examined.
Results: Findings were mixed: 55% of the included studies reported positive
effect sizes and 45% negative. However, the overall effect size was not statistically
significant (g = 0.0234, SE = 0.235, 95% CI: −0.438 to 0.483, p = 0.921), with
substantial heterogeneity across studies (I2 = 99.83%). Larger studies tended
to report positive associations, while smaller studies yielded negative or
inconsistent effects. Inconsistencies in measurement tools, particularly across
AQ versions, contributed to this variability.
Conclusion: Although a significant association was not confirmed, the high
heterogeneity highlights the need for more standardized approaches to
evaluating autistic traits in non-clinical adult populations. These findings
underscore the complexity of subclinical autism and support the relevance of
transdiagnostic research frameworks to better understand its relationship with
anxiety.





