Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGonzález-García, Jaime
dc.contributor.authorGiráldez-Costas, Verónica
dc.contributor.authorRuiz-Moreno, Carlos
dc.contributor.authorGutiérrez-Hellín, Jorge
dc.contributor.authorRomero-Moraleda, Blanca
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-20T15:50:15Z
dc.date.available2025-01-20T15:50:15Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationGonzález-García, J., Giráldez-Costas, V., Ruiz-Moreno, C., Gutiérrez-Hellín, J., & Romero-Moraleda, B. (2021). Delayed potentiation effects on neuromuscular performance after optimal load and high load resistance priming sessions using velocity loss. European journal of sport science, 21(12), 1617-1627. https://doi.org/10.1080/17461391.2020.1845816es
dc.identifier.issn1746-1391
dc.identifier.otherhttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33135577/es
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12020/1531
dc.description.abstractAim: (i) to compare the effects of two different low-volume resistance priming sessions, where the external load is modified on neuromuscular performance after 6 h of rest; and (ii) to identify the effects on psychological readiness in participants with resistance training experience. Methods: Eleven participants (Body mass: 77.0 ± 8.9 kg; Body height: 1.76 ± 0.08 m; Half squat repetition maximum: 139.8 ± 22.4 kg) performed the priming session under three experimental conditions in a randomized and cross-over design during the morning. The control (CON) condition: no resistance training, "optimal load" (OL) condition: two half-squat sets with a velocity loss of around 20% were performed with the "optimal load", and 80% of repetition maximum (80% RM) condition: 2 half-squat sets with a velocity loss of around 20% were performed with the 80% RM. Countermovement jump (CMJ), mean power with OL (MPOL) and 80% RM (MP80RM), and mean velocity with OL (MVOL) and 80% RM (MV80RM) were assessed six hours after the intervention. Subjective readiness was also recorded prior to resistance training and evaluation. Significance was set at p < 0.05. Results: CMJ was higher after the 80% RM intervention than CON (p < 0.001; Δ = 6.5% [3.4-9.5]). MPOL and MVOL seemed to be unaffected by both morning sessions. Higher MP80RM (p = 0.044; Δ = 9.7% [4.0-15.6]; d = 0.24[0.10-0.37]) and MV80RM (p = 0.004; Δ = 8.1% [3.2-13.3]; d = 0.32[0.13-0.52]) after 80% RM than after CON were observed. No effect was observed on psychological readiness. Conclusions: 80% RM priming session increased CMJ height and the capacity to generate power and velocity under a high-load condition without any effect on psychological readinesses
dc.language.isoenes
dc.publisherRoutledgees
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.titleDelayed potentiation effects on neuromuscular performance after optimal load and high load resistance priming sessions using velocity losses
dc.typearticlees
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1080/17461391.2020.1845816
dc.issue.number12es
dc.journal.titleEuropean journal of sport sciencees
dc.page.initial1617es
dc.page.final1627es
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccesses
dc.subject.areaCiencias de la Actividad Física y del Deportees
dc.subject.keywordPoweres
dc.subject.keywordPrecompetitiones
dc.subject.keywordReadinesses
dc.subject.keywordSquates
dc.subject.keywordVelocity-based Traininges
dc.subject.unesco2411.06 Fisiología del Ejercicioes
dc.volume.number21es


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional