Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMora Serrano, Jeimy
dc.contributor.authorChulvi Medrano, Iván
dc.contributor.authorMartínez Guardado, Ismael
dc.contributor.authorAlonso Aubin, Diego Alexandre
dc.date.accessioned2024-12-11T17:45:16Z
dc.date.available2024-12-11T17:45:16Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifier.citationMora-Serrano, J. S., Chulvi-Medrano, I., Martínez-Guardado, I., & Alonso-Aubin, D. A. (2024). Influence of the Menstrual Cycle on Performance in CrossFit®. Applied Sciences, 14(13), 5403. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14135403es
dc.identifier.issn2076-3417
dc.identifier.otherhttps://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/14/13/5403es
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12020/1414
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this study was to compare the fast maximal dynamic strength, maximal dynamic strength, and muscular endurance changes between the follicular phase (FP) and luteal phase (LP) in the menstrual cycle (MC). Fourteen healthy resistance-trained CrossFit® athletes and eumenorrheic women without oral contraception participated in this study (age: 29.64 ± 3.95 years; height: 1.62 ± 0.04 m and mass: 60.43 ± 6.56 kg). A double cross-sectional and descriptive study was developed to evaluate strength, power, and muscular endurance performance in the FP (days 5 to 7) and LP (days 20 to 23). In each assessment, the subjects performed three countermovement jumps (CMJs) for assessing fast maximal dynamic strength using My Jump 2, one-repetition maximum (1-RM) on deep squat for maximal dynamic strength, and the Karen® protocol for muscular endurance. The data were analyzed using a paired sample t-test to determine whether there were any significant differences between FP and LP for all the assessments and the significance was set at p ≤ 0.05. Results revealed no significant differences between the FP and LP in performance: (a) fast maximal dynamic strength (FP: 0.27 ± 0.04 m; LP: 0.29 ± 0.04 m; t = 0.98; p = 0.34; ES = 0.26); (b) maximal dynamic strength (FP: 88.14 ± 12.60 kg; LP: 87.07 ± 12.51 kg; t = 0.90; p = 0.38; ES = 0.24); and (c) muscular endurance (FP: 459.43 ± 92.71 s; LP: 456.93 ± 110.68 s; t = 0.27; p = 0.78; ES = 0.07). CrossFit® performance is not altered during the MC in CrossFit® trained athletes. However, monitoring the MC and its symptoms could be used to adapt the training prescription to the needs and preferences of the athletes.es
dc.language.isoenes
dc.publisherMDPIes
dc.rightsAtribución 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.titleInfluence of the Menstrual Cycle on Performance in CrossFit®es
dc.typearticlees
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3390/app14135403
dc.issue.number13es
dc.journal.titleApplied Scienceses
dc.page.initial5403es
dc.page.final5403es
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccesses
dc.subject.areaCiencias de la Actividad Física y del Deportees
dc.subject.keywordFollicular Phasees
dc.subject.keywordLuteal Phasees
dc.subject.keywordTraininges
dc.subject.keywordStrengthes
dc.subject.keywordFemalees
dc.subject.keywordResponsees
dc.subject.unesco32 Ciencias Médicases
dc.volume.number14es


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Atribución 4.0 Internacional
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Atribución 4.0 Internacional